![nexuiz mac os x nexuiz mac os x](https://www.phoronix.com/data/img/results/apple_linux_gaming/2.png)
That way you'll have access to DirectX 11 and be able to run games like Battlefield 3 and so on.
#Nexuiz mac os x pro
So, if you really care about COD4 performance, you basically need to get as fast a CPU as possible (and I wouldn't have put the 2006 Mac Pro in that category).Īt the end of the day, if you really really care about game performance, then sure go and run a Windows PC. That's just a side effect of COD4 being an inefficient port to Mac OS X. Your GPU could be infinitely fast and your FPS wouldn't budge. That means, the main thread of the game is going to peg one CPU core at 100%, and be unable to feed the GPU enough work for the GPU to matter. Many other newer games like Portal 2, Deus Ex: Human Revolution, Diablo 3 or WoW:MoP all run really well under Mac OS X, even with slightly older hardware.ĬOD4 is going to be completely CPU limited. As discussed before, COD4 is just not a great Mac port. I'm not sure what you're complaining about exactly. Playing back video is not stressful on the GPU at all, in general. A 5870 has also shown to not be not much faster in a Mac Pro 1,1 than a 5770 (which is cooler running but performance on par with your 4870).Īlso here is an official review of 4870 and what to possibly expect in performance in CoD4. If you have zero intention of ever gaming in Windows then you need to spend for a better card yes but you'll hit a diminishing return very quickly and never reach these numbers even with a GTX680. Here is a 5870 OC'd and frame locked at 91FPS user claimed it would be over 120 if frame lock was removed.Īs I have said you don't need to spend more on a better card for these games. Unfortunately they don't have a frame counter viewable. Here is some people on You Tube claiming 60-120FPS in CoD4 and your 4870 in Windows. It is still no match for any of the newer cards in option #1 but it offers boot screens via DVI. It is in fact based on a later version of G92 and is thus quieter, cooler and faster than original.
#Nexuiz mac os x software
It can enable MPE in Adobe software whereas Apple's can't. We offer an 8800GT 1GB card that is significantly faster and more useful than the original Apple one. Apple 57 can run 3 displays at once, including 2 Apple LED.ģ. Apple 5770 is almost as fast and has boot screens. Apple OEM 4870 is 512 Megs, kind of a drag. 6870 is supported in OS but there is no way to see a bootscreen in a 1,1. Flashed 5870s offer boot screen via VGA only. The most powerful ATI card with boot screens is the Apple OEM 5870. When you have system or OS issues, not having a bootscreen is a deal breaker.Ģ. At the very least, keep an old 7300GT on hand. I do not think that having no boot screens EVER is a good idea. (see thread started by Asgorath) Use a 2600XT or an EFI32 GT120 for these. Use any Nvidia card you like and accept that there will be no boot screens. So you can use AMD cards up through 5870 in a 1,1 but the 8800GT is last official EFI card for 1,1.ġ.
#Nexuiz mac os x 64 Bit
ATI/AMD has written their EFI in what is known as "EBC" which can function in either 32 bit or 64 bit worlds. Sadly, for reasons I don't fully understand Nvidia writes their EFI in a 64bit version only since the 8800GT.